How To Create A Strategy For Future Sustainability & Success: The OPEN MINDS Strategic Planning Process

Realizing “market advantage” means strategically planning for market advantage—a process that “everyone does,” but few executives perfect. When done well, strategic plans can either assure sustainability and drive performance, or they can make sure the organization can adapt quickly enough to make real-time adjustments.

To help with that, this month I’m looking at a great, field-tested approach to strategy development—one that prioritizes organizational performance metrics and an understanding of the changing market landscape in terms of competitors, customers, and payers. Importantly, it also ties strategy to budgets—making certain that organizations have a detailed implementation plan for achieving their strategic objectives with a realistic budget to make it happen.

The Four-Phases Of The OPEN MINDS Strategic Planning Process

This strategic planning process has four phases. The first phase includes the visioning, analysis, and development of a strategic vision and objectives for the future. The second and third phases turn the strategic objectives into an implementation plan, with a budget that will support that plan. The final phase is implementing the plan itself.

A good strategic plan interprets your organization’s mission and vision and provides clear direction to your team for the near-term and long-term future. It establishes strategic priorities and allocates your financial and management resources accordingly. It also provides a basis for departmental and programmatic planning, as well as on-going performance reporting of progress in achieving your strategic objectives.

Phase I: Understanding Where You Are & Where You Want to Be

The first phase of the strategic planning process is to understand where your organization is in the current market (brand image, performance, differentiation from competitors, etc.) and where you want it to be (market position, including your service portfolio, target consumers, and payers). This will include a review of your current mission and vision in the context of the market’s environmental trends, and crafting a sustainable vision for the future.

During this first phase, you will conduct an analysis of internal market factors and the external market landscape. The phase ends with the strategic planning visioning session in which you and your team review and discuss the internal and external strategic analysis. Finally, you will develop a draft list of strategic objectives for your organization. Typically, you should end up with 3-5 strategic objectives to accomplish in a 2–3-year timeframe.

Phase II: Strategy Development With Tactics, High-Level Implementation Plan, & Timeline

At the end of phase one, you should have two things—a summary of your strategic analysis of the internal and external data (i.e., what the data means and the implications for your organization in terms of strategy) and a vision for the future that includes a short list of strategic objectives. The second phase of the strategic planning process is developing a detailed plan for making that vision and those objectives happen.

Phase III: Detailed Implementation Planning, Budgeting & Feasibility Analysis

Once the implementation plan has been developed, the third phase is where you incorporate the strategies into plans and budgets for the next two fiscal years—including operating plans, talent management, technology plans, and financial management. This process is usually iterative until you land on a realistic plan where the tactics and initiatives are budgeted. Phase three is also where you ask yourself an important feasibility question—“Can we really make this plan happen with the resources we have?”

Phase IV: Strategy Implementation

The final phase of the strategic planning process is making the strategy happen. This requires the tools, talents, and processes to ensure the implementation plan is on track and that your organization achieves its strategic objectives.

Throughout the four phases of this strategic planning process, you and your team are trying to answer several strategic questions:

  • What is your “vision” for the market position of your organization’s service lines in the years ahead?
  • What are your key objectives for the next three years?
  • What services will be the anchor of margins and sustainability in the emerging market landscape?
  • What services do you need to add and what services do you need to terminate?
  • What is required to assure competitive positioning (merger, technology, contracts, new service model, etc.)?
  • What are the likely future scenarios that could reshape the market landscape and organizational sustainability?
  • Can your organization maintain financial stability in the “next normal” at its current scale?
  • Does your organization’s mission need to change?
  •  

Who Should Do What? Scope of Practice; Treatment Tech Shift Clinical Best Practices

By Monica E. Oss, Chief Executive Officer

There has been a long debate about the scope of health care practices. What type of licensed clinical professionals can perform particular functions? Should psychologists and/or pharmacists prescribe psychotropic medications? What supervision do nurse practitioners and physician assistants need? (Should ‘physician assistants’ be renamed ‘physician associates’?)

Psychologists can prescribe in five states: Louisiana, New Mexico, Illinois, Iowa, and Idaho (see Can Psychologists Prescribe Medications?). The scope of pharmacists’ practices is state-dependent and varies widely from state-to-state (see Mapping U.S. Statewide Protocols For Pharmacist Prescriptive Authority). Pharmacists may or may not give injections and immunizations and prescribe everything from naloxone, tobacco cession aids, travel medications, and more. Physician Assistants are licensed to practice in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, all US territories, and the uniformed services. Physician Assistants are authorized to prescribe medications in all jurisdictions where they are licensed, except Puerto Rico (see PA Prescribing and Assessing Scope of Practice in Health Care Delivery: Critical Questions in Assuring Public Access and Safety).

Executives of health and human service organizations need to plan to leverage the ‘value’ of their clinical team members by developing systems where they can work at the ‘top of their practice’—with most of their time going to the services that require their specific level of training. But that is easy to say and much harder to accomplish in practice. This type of service specialization is an essential part of the specialization needed to achieve maximum operational efficiency—and the highest value.

But there are two factors that complicate plans for specialization to increase value. The first is that in systems that are increasingly rewarded for a ‘whole person’ approach to care—which runs contrary to specialization. The second is that health care treatment technologies are reaching a level of sophistication that they can be a replacement for some of the work of licensed clinical professionals. The key for executive teams is using technology to address both of these issues. The first is ‘virtual integration’—creating a singular consumer data set that is available to all health care professionals. The second is to use data—both small data and big data—to develop algorithms that curate the recommendation of treatment services for specific consumers—both treatment technology and the most appropriate clinical professional. These are essentials to sustainability—building organizational efficiencies that result in competitive advantage.

For more on our coverage of efficiency and effectiveness in staffing models—and in emerging treatment technology, check out these resources in the OPEN MINDS Industry Library.

Scope of Practice Issues

Digital Treatment Trends & Strategy

Digital Treatment Developments

For more on managing and practicing at the top of your team’s skillsets, join me for The 2022 OPEN MIND Management Best Practices Institute in Newport Beach, California from August 30 to September 1, 2022.

Qualifacts + Credible Acquires InSync Healthcare Solutions

GETTYSBURG, Pa. (January 9, 2022) – Qualifacts + Credible, a leading provider of electronic health record platforms for behavioral health and human services organizations, today announced it has acquired InSync Healthcare Solutions.

InSync Healthcare Solutions is a leading provider of EHR and practice management software plus revenue cycle management services for behavioral, medical and rehabilitative professionals.

Qualifacts + Credible is adding InSync’s highly configurable, clean and intuitive platform to their portfolio of EHR solutions.

“The acquisition allows the combined organization to deliver innovation, technology, customer support, and complementary solutions to a broader behavioral health and human services market,” said Paul Ricci, chief executive officer of Qualifacts + Credible. ”It also better positions us for long-term growth by expanding our ability to serve small to medium-sized practices and agencies.”

Demand for behavioral health is on the rise, according to data from the Kaiser Family Foundation. As of January 2021, approximately four in 10 U.S. adults reported symptoms of anxiety or depression compared to one in 10 from January–June of 2019.

About 40% of behavioral providers work in smaller behavioral health organizations with fewer than 50 full time employees.

The company will continue to support all three platforms, with CareLogic and the Credible platforms remaining primarily focused on enterprise accounts.

InSync’s flexible and easy to use solutions for small to medium-sized practices and agencies will be enhanced by Qualifacts + Credible’s innovation and advanced technology capabilities.

“We’re excited to be part of an organization that is also focused on providing technology that empowers behavioral health providers to deliver the best care,” said Roland Therriault, executive vice president and general manager of InSync Healthcare Solutions.

Qualifacts + Credible currently has over 900 customers across 43 states making it one of the largest behavioral health EHR vendors in the country. The addition of InSync doubles the size of the organization’s customer count and it will serve over 10 million patients in all 50 states.

ABOUT QUALIFACTS + CREDIBLE    

Qualifacts + Credible is one of the largest behavioral health and human services EHR vendors in the country. Its mission is to partner with customers to support and extend their ability to deliver quality care and improve the lives of the clients they serve. With more than 20 years of experience and two of the highest rated platforms, its products and services help customers achieve interoperability goals, optimize efficiency, improve productivity, and maximize reimbursement.

ABOUT WARBURG PINCUS 
Qualifacts + Credible is a portfolio company of private equity firm Warburg Pincus LLC.

This leading global growth investor has more than $67 billion in private equity assets under management. The firm’s active portfolio of more than 215 companies is highly diversified by stage, sector, and geography. Warburg Pincus is an experienced partner to management teams seeking to build durable companies with sustainable value.

ABOUT INSYNC HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS    
InSync Healthcare Solutions is a leading provider of EHR and practice management software plus revenue cycle management services for behavioral, medical and rehabilitative professionals. InSync leverages advanced technology, best-in-class partnerships and proven business processes to provide services and solutions that translate into better efficiency for healthcare organizations.

How To Manage The 5% With Multiple Chronic Conditions & Complex Support Needs

By Monica E. Oss
There is a lot of investment money going into the mental health field—in fact, $14.7 billion in the first half of this year (see Why Are Digital First Mental Health Companies So Popular?). Much of that investment is focused on digital behavioral health systems and tools for both professional and self-care.

However, these new platforms and tools are not the perfect fit for every consumer with a mental illness. In fact, 25% of consumers with any mental illness have a serious mental illness (SMI). In all, 13.1 million consumers, or 5% of the total United States population, have an SMI (see Key Substance Use & Mental Health Indicators In The United States: Results From The 2019 National Survey On Drug Use & Health). Of consumers with SMI, 27% have co-occurring substance use disorders. We also know that SMI consumers on average tend to die 10 to 25 years earlier than the general population—and have a mortality rate that is twice as high as that of the general population because of chronic physical medical conditions such as cardiovascular, respiratory, and infectious diseases; diabetes; and hypertension (see Premature Death Among People With Severe Mental Disorders). 20% of the SMI population lives in poverty Approximately 20% of jail inmates and 15% of state prison inmates have an SMI (see Mental Health & Criminal Justice). 33% of the homeless population has an SMI (see 250,000 Mentally Ill Are Homeless. 140,000 Seriously Mentally Ill Are Homeless).

For the approximately 5% of the population—those with multiple chronic conditions and complex support needs—that use a majority of the health care resources, a different approach is needed to assure good consumer outcomes and prevent inappropriate use of resources. That population was the focus of our recent discussion with Carole Matyas, Vice President, Operations at Sunshine Health, and the keynote speaker at the upcoming 2021 OPEN MINDS Executive Leadership Retreat.

On September 22, Ms. Matyas will deliver the keynote address, The Future Of Managing Care For Consumers With An SMI—What Works. The cornerstone of progressive interventions for the high-risk/high-needs population with a serious mental illness is based on a “whole person” treatment strategy that encompasses medical, behavioral, pharmacy, social needs, and caregiver collaboration and coordination. Ms. Matyas will review Sunshine Health programs that are showing promising positive outcomes such as reduced use of acute/crisis care, better engagement with primary care that improves medical health outcomes and addresses high comorbidity issues, stabilized community-based living environment by addressing social needs for the enrolled Medicaid and Medicare members served. She will provide an overview of their Long Acting Injectable (LAI) program with data that demonstrates reductions in emergency department and inpatient services, and increase in community-based and medical services for members.

My takeaway from our pre-Institute discussion with Ms. Matyas? The Sunshine Health approach to optimizing the management of consumers with an SMI has four key components—intensive case management to assure care coordination, leveraging long-acting medications, a focus on primary care, and addressing social support needs.

Intensive case management to assure care coordination. One approach that has improved outcomes for SMI consumers is intensive case management. Sunshine Health took its top 400 high-needs, high-risk consumers (who have 30+ hospital admissions a year, go to the emergency room every other week, and reject any type of community-based treatment) and had its staff provide proactive and intensive case management services in collaboration with a host of community provider organizations and stakeholders. For example, case managers work closely with a telehealth provider organization that Sunshine Health contracts with to ensure that consumers discharged from hospital have their seven-day follow up appointment virtually and then connect them with an outpatient provider organization for ongoing care.

Leveraging long medications. Sunshine Health has been encouraging provider organizations to use long-acting injectables (LAIs) for antipsychotic medication administration. Ms. Matyas shared that SMI consumers receiving monthly LAIs have shown significant stabilization in their mental health and also do better at getting care for their comorbid medical conditions, engage with peers socially, and are even able to have part-time employment. She said, “We are promoting use of LAIs and really going a long way in working with hospital systems, primary care physicians, and mental health providers to make it easy to obtain those medications, administer them, monitor, and do outreach so members continue treatment. While the medications can be expensive, the results definitely show reductions in hospitalizations, readmissions, and emergency room visits as well as better outcomes from community-based treatment.”

Sunshine Health has a number of strategies to increase the use of LAIs. They do not require provider organizations to obtain prior authorizations to administer LAIs. In addition, if clinical professionals start an LAI when a consumer is in the hospital, case managers make sure to follow up with the consumer to make sure they get to the outpatient provider organization for their next dose when it’s due. They also have a “concierge program” within their pharmacy network and customer service representatives call members to schedule an appointment for their next LAI dose. Some pharmacies are also authorized to administer the LAIs. Sunshine’s provider relations team is charged with providing information about LAIs to community mental health and primary care provider organizations.

Ms. Matyas said, “We have a goal of increasing long acting injectables 25% year over year. During the pandemic, we had interruptions with folks getting their long acting injectables, but we are working towards getting back to normal state, which is encouraging.” And now there are two barriers to overcome to extend the use of LAIs, she added. The first is adherence which becomes challenging when consumers are say, cycling in and out of homelessness and are not stable in their environment or engaged in their treatment. The other issue is that there’s a history of long acting injectables not getting authorized by managed care. So provider organizations need to be educated and learn that “they don’t have to jump through a lot of hoops” to be able to prescribe LAIs if appropriate for the consumers.

Focus on primary care. Sunshine Health is encouraging provider organizations to go the integrated care route by participating in health home models and value-based reimbursement (VBR) models. They are also leveraging data to encourage collaborations and equipping primary care provider organizations to better address the needs of SMI consumers. Recently, they launched a behavioral health home program and seven community mental health centers have signed up to date. These centers have co-located primary care and behavioral health services and are delivering whole-person care under value-based contracts.

VBR is the cornerstone for integrated care. Sunshine Health offers incentives for provider organizations to address “gaps in medical and behavioral care.” In the behavioral health homes program, the incentive program is contingent on preventive health screenings being conducted for all consumers and on addressing the comorbidities that SMI consumers have. All provider organizations in Sunshine’s network—whether they are primary care practices or community mental health centers—are expected to address comorbidities and to report on the array of HEDIS measures related to both medical and behavioral care. Ultimately, Ms. Matyas explained, “The goal is to move more to value-based care, where we can impact members by having them in a health care environment so that they don’t have to go eight different places to get the care they need. They should be able to be more easily referred and seen, for whatever service it is they need. Value-based care incentivizes providers to work together without dictating a one-size-fits-all model.”

Sunshine Health embeds behavioral health services in primary care and offers psychiatrists who can consult on prescribing patterns and other issues in the care of SMI consumers. Ms. Matyas explained, “Every member covered by us is assigned a primary care provider regardless of whether they have an SMI diagnosis or not. So every one of the 5% of our 2.6 million members with SMI has a primary care physician. We take the data to our primary care practices and say, ‘Here are the demographics of the population assigned to you and here are the care gaps.’ The primary care practices will tell us whether they can handle the whole-health needs of these SMI members or want us to move them to a different provider. Or the practices may say they are equipped to handle some things but not others. So then we bring in behavioral health quality practice advisors to work with them, or we move the SMI members to a primary care practice that is better suited to work with this population.”

Addressing social support needs. Sunshine Health addresses social determinants of health (SDOH) in a variety of ways. Many of their behavioral health provider organizations have robust case management programs and the case managers connect consumers to social supports as needed. The health plan maintains a database of community resources that these case managers can access on request. They also offer micro grants to small community projects that support social needs. Some of their Medicaid programs, like the SMI specialty plan, have expanded benefits such as housing rental deposit or one month’s advance rent to help consumers get into housing. They’ve distributed cell phones and tablets for consumer use. SMI consumers get $35 a month in over-the-counter benefits from CVS to buy non-prescription items.

The fact that health plans are looking at primary care as the hub for SMI treatment should be a wake-up call for specialty provider organization executives who believe that their niche in serving this population assures a steady stream of business. Assuming responsibility for the whole-person care (medical, behavioral, and social) of the SMI populations served and participating in value-based arrangements are becoming the basics for sustainability planning.

Value-Based Reimbursement Models Help SPARC Get A Leg Up In Medicaid Managed Care Contracting

By Meena Dayak

SPARC Services & Programs (SPARC) is a behavioral health provider organization in North Carolina that has been providing home and community-based services since 2015. They serve 425 consumers monthly and employ 70 full-time staff. They focus on complex consumers—children and adults with severe and persistent mental illnesses (SPMI) who have not been successful with residential and other traditional treatment services—and work to keep them out of institutional care. Currently, most of their consumers are covered by Medicaid, although they have just started to expand into the commercial insurance space. SPARC’s service array includes outpatient services, home and community-based therapy services, rehabilitation services to help consumers transition from residential treatment to community living, support for daily living activities to help consumers live independently in the community, case management, and enhanced crisis response.

Since its inception, SPARC has operated predominantly through value-based reimbursement (VBR) arrangements with managed care organizations. SPARC’s Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer, Teri Herrmann, MA, talked to OPEN MINDS about their VBR models and how they have helped to advance the mission of SPARC.

Reimbursement Models

SPARC currently has two VBR contracts with two managed care organizations (MCOs), Cardinal Innovations and Partners Behavioral Health Management. 26% of their consumers receive services under these VBR models, which constitute nearly 48% of SPARC’s total revenue.

Both of SPARC’s VBR contracts are based on per member per month (PMPM) case rates. When a consumer is referred to them, they do an assessment and seek initial authorization for treatment from the health plan. Typically they get a 6-month authorization and bill one unit per month. The case rates range from $2,800 to $3,000 per month.

SPARC’s very first health plan contract with Cardinal Innovations in 2015—for children’s services—was a value-based contract with downside risk. If a child receiving Family Centered Treatment® (FCT) services from SPARC entered into residential care either during the course of treatment or up to a year post-treatment, then SPARC had to give money back to the payer. “It was pretty unheard of in that landscape,” said Ms. Herrmann. After a year, SPARC re-evaluated the contract with the payer and decided that the goal was “too aggressive.” They re-negotiated the contract to make payback contingent on no readmissions within six months of treatment. The health plan was flexible with value-based contracting as it was new territory for them, too, said Ms. Herrmann. So now, if during treatment, or up to six months post-treatment, the consumer enters into residential care or stays in an inpatient setting longer than 10 days, then SPARC is charged back up to 30% of the amount that they have billed. Ms. Herrmann noted that they’ve had to pay monies back to their health plan, especially because the consumers they serve are so complex but SPARC remains committed to value-based contracting because of the longer term potential for revenue growth and the flexibility offered by the model to improve the quality of care.

In a second value-based contract with Partners Behavioral Health, SPARC has an incentive-based payment with upside risk only for children in FCT. If the children—who receive home and community based services from SPARC—are able to remain at home three months and six months after discharge from a residential facility, then SPARC receives incentives.

For one year, SPARC also had a value-based contract with Cardinal Innovations (operating under a North Carolina Department of Justice mandate) to help adults with SPMI—who had been “inappropriately placed” in adult care homes—transition to independent living in the community. This was a value-based contract with upside risk only, where SPARC was rewarded if they could help consumers transition successfully from the adult care homes and keep them in community housing through continuous interventions.

Success Factors For Value-Based Reimbursement

Ms. Herrmann attributes the success of value-based reimbursement to four factors—a strong referral network, the use of evidence-based practices in treatment, robust data integration and reporting capabilities, and a mindset of innovation and risk tolerance.

Value-based reimbursement—and the “willingness to take on consumers that no one else wants”—has strengthened SPARC’s status as a “preferred provider” with health plans and other state entities. They receive referrals from their MCOs, local hospital systems, state social services and juvenile justice departments, residential treatment facilities, and community-based provider organizations. Ms. Herrmann said, “We’ve got a pretty sophisticated referral process that tracks all our referral sources, and then aligns them with the payers. We can see what’s working and see where the holes are so we can put a referral marketing plan in place to address the gaps.” In addition, 85% of referral sources reported that SPARC kept them informed of the status of their referral. This “closed loop” referral approach strengthens SPARC’s appeal in helping to maintain continuity of care.

SPARC was built on the foundation of the family-centered treatment (FCT) model, an evidence-based practice (EBP) with a trauma treatment model of home-based family therapy that Ms. Hermann was involved in developing in the early 2000s. She underscored that using FCT helped to achieve the improved outcomes that value-based models demand. The use of EBPs is accompanied by relevant training and certification for staff using the model, which replaces some of the prior mandated state training that was not always relevant to the services staff delivered.

Ms. Herrmann describes herself as a “data nerd” focused on assimilating and continuously monitoring outcomes data to examine the potential to improve services. She said, “We don’t just want to measure if the person showed up. We want to objectively look at each person and if they are getting better.” They have built their electronic health record system to produce the key data and desired reports and are continuously working with their developers to manipulate and learn from the data. SPARC applies this data-informed approach across their value-based as well as fee-for-service programs so they can improve performance all around. Ms. Herrmann noted that the health plans are primarily looking for data on avoidance of emergency department utilization and avoidance of inpatient services or residential care for the consumers that SPARC serves. She said, “We’ve had a pretty long placement culture here in North Carolina that we’re slowly changing the tide on. If someone really needs those more acute levels of care, there is a place in the continuum for them. But we don’t want those services to be overutilized for the wrong reasons. And so that’s where we’re really focused for outcomes measurement right now.”

SPARC was proactive from the outset and proposed value-based contracting to their health plans. Ms. Herrmann elaborated, “As we were brainstorming and envisioning the concept for this company, we wanted to serve those niche individuals whose needs weren’t being met. And we were hearing from stakeholders and payers that they were really struggling to figure out what services to get to them. So we saw that we had to be innovative. We knew that starting a company and immediately jumping into value-based contracts was a little risky. But we also knew it would say a lot about us. As a new provider organization, we said to the health plans, ‘Let’s take this walk in value-based work together and learn.’ And this pitch for risk-based contracting opened doors that may not otherwise have been opened.”

Services & Outcomes

For 2019, SPARC reported the following outcomes from its range of services covered by value-based contracts (see SPARC Services & Programs: 2019 NC Outcome Data).

Family-Centered Treatment: Family-centered treatment (FCT) is an evidence-based practice with four phases of treatment—joining and assessment, restructuring, valuing changes, and generalization. FCT is targeted toward consumers at risk for higher levels of residential service—those with extensive histories of using acute services without successful outcomes; those who’ve been hospitalized with little prior treatment and are being recommended for residential services; and those currently in residential treatment where discharge is delayed because of lack of family systems.

Services are intensive with a minimum of 10 hours per month provided to the family. FCT incorporates trauma treatment and coordination with other systems, such as the school, justice, primary care, and social service systems as well as 24/7/365 crisis intervention services. FCT seeks to confirm and capitalize on internal changes within the family so that the family is not dependent on the therapist once services terminate. Families also have the opportunity to give back to their communities and share what they have learned with other families.

While starting FCT at SPARC, 57% of referrals were in some form of an out-of-home placement and 43% were at home with their family. After treatment, 81% of consumers receiving FCT were able to remain with or be reunified in the community with their family or another caregiver. 100% of families were engaged in treatment, participating in five or more sessions in 30 days. And 96% of families reported that treatment improved their family life.

In-Home Therapy Services: In-home therapy services (IHTS) is a combination of motivational interviewing and care coordination provided in the home and community to children and their families where there are complex clinical needs that traditional outpatient therapy cannot adequately address. IHTS is a time limited service, approximately 6 months, in which a therapist and the case manager work with the child and their family to meet the therapeutic needs as well as provide linkage to professional and natural supports. The case manager works with the various systems involved with the child and family, such as the school, primary care, social services, and justice systems. Upon discharge from IHTS, children and their families can continue to receive outpatient therapy to ensure continuity of care.

85% of families successfully completed treatment and 97% of consumers were either at home with family, or in other family placements, at the time of discharge from treatment.

Transition management services: Transition management services (TMS) is a rehabilitative service intended to increase and restore a consumer’s ability to live successfully in the community by maintaining tenancy in community housing. TMS increases the consumer’s ability to live as independently as possible, managing their illness, and reestablishing their community roles related to emotional, social safety, housing, medical and health, educational, vocational, and legal services. TMS provides structured rehabilitative interventions and works in partnership with the individual’s behavioral health service provider.

90% of members participating in services were able to both obtain and maintain their housing in 2019. Only 5% were discharged from the program because they needed a higher level of care. And the program is working with 98% of consumers are on four or more social determinants of health in addition to their housing needs.

Enhanced crisis response: The enhanced crisis response (ECR) service is intended to put supports in place as quickly as possible for youth with behavioral health needs that are at risk for abandonment, crisis episodes, or being placed in restrictive levels of care. With timely assessments and supports, ECR is intended to keep youth in their environment—such as non-therapeutic foster homes, kinship placements—or minimize needs for long stays in residential treatment. Services last 60 to 90 days on average. SPARC staff work with consumers and families to diffuse the imminent crisis and get the family linked to appropriate community-based services that allow the consumer to thrive and meet their goals.

71% of youth who were discharged from the program in 2019 were able to be discharged into the community with community-based services.

Overall, SPARC’s services received an average customer satisfaction rating of 4.6 stars on a 5-point scale. The net promoter score (based on consumers and families sharing the likelihood that they would refer others to SPARC services) was 4.3 stars.

Benefits Of Value-Based Reimbursement

Ms. Hermann explained that value-based treatment has incentivized service quality and built more staff buy-in for outcomes-driven treatment, afforded flexibility, and proved to be good for business development. She said, “We knew that the landscape of health care is shifting to value-based care, we want to jump in with both feet and have skin in the game. It forced us to say doing ‘A-level’ work isn’t good enough, we need to do ‘A-plus’ work. We committed to a pretty aggressive value-based contract because without that, we knew this would not be a sustainable model.”

The value-based model drives performance-based compensation incentives for staff, which increases their buy-in for achieving better outcomes. Ms. Hermann elaborated, “If a client is in crisis, the therapist response at eight o’clock at night is not just ‘Well go to the emergency room.’ Sometimes that’s a needed intervention but often it’s not. They know that once somebody goes to the emergency room, the whole treatment plan can get derailed. And so our clinicians want to go the extra mile, not only because it’s the right thing to do but also because we have some skin in the game. It creates just a little shift for them at the frontline level, so that they’re committed to providing unique services and really engage in creative problem solving.”

The services SPARC delivers under value-based contracts are labeled “in lieu of services” and have been designated by MCOs to meet an unmet need in their communities. Therefore service definitions afford more freedom and flexibility and avoid the need to fit the treatment model into a state plan amendment service definition which sometimes can be like “fitting a square peg in a round hole.” The VBR model is also designed to reduce administrative burden on provider organizations and payers. For example, given that FCT as an EBP is known to typically discharge families with successful outcomes after six months of treatment, six months of services are authorized at the outset. So instead of wrangling submissions for authorization, clinical professionals can focus on delivering needed services. And the intensity of treatment can be increased or decreased depending on current needs. “If a crisis happens and we need to increase the intensity and frequency of services, we don’t have to go back to that payer and request more time and risk potential denial. That is a huge difference between some of our fee-for-service vs. value based contracts,” said Ms. Herrmann.

Value-based contracting has created opportunity for SPARC to expand its mission to keep consumers out of institutional care. And it has allowed stakeholders to see their innovation and that creativity and to come to them when there are new needs. “It has allowed us to have opportunities that I’m not sure we would’ve had if we’d come in as a provider saying we want to do regular fee-for-service contracting,” Ms. Hermann said.

What’s next? As SPARC moves into providing more services for mild and moderate mental illnesses and pursues contracts with commercial insurance, value-based contracting will continue to define their business development efforts. They plan to work with their MCOs to move from an individual consumer focus to applying a population health lens in their VBR models. They are also looking to focus more on whole-person value-based care and to and certify and train staff to become a “care management agency” as part of North Carolina’s Medicaid transformation (see North Carolina Extends Deadline For Tailored Plan Care Management Applications To June 1, 2021). In addition to Cardinal Innovations Healthcare and Partners Behavioral Health Management, SPARC has entered into contracts with five more managed care organizations appointed by North Carolina Medicaid—WellCare of NC, AmeriHealth Caritas of NC, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of NC, United Healthcare of NC, and Carolina Complete Health, Inc. As these new MCOs get ready for value-based care—once they understand their new consumers and the needs—SPARC is well-poised to leverage their experience and hit the ground running. “We’re really committed to continuing to learn more and doing more in the value based space,” summarized Ms. Herrmann.

The Future Is 2020 In The Rearview Mirror: A 2021 Forecast

The COVID-19 pandemic caused major shifts throughout organizations, industries, and the entire world. The behavioral health and human services market is no exception. As we look back on 2020, there were some short-term tactics that we anticipated would be around for a while to allow provider organizations to create stability, resiliency, and success while weathering the ‘new normal’ we have all been faced with.

Monica Oss, Chief Executive Officer of OPEN MINDS, delivered this presentation on April 6, 2021, and shared insights on how far the behavioral health and human services industry has come since the COVID-19 pandemic struck just over one-year ago.

Learning Objectives:

  • The 12 critical actions successful leaders were taking last year to combat market challenges, and which are still being utilized today
  • How organizations are keeping their employees engaged and motivated to avoid burnout
  • Preparing for the ‘next normal’ – transitioning to the post-pandemic environment

 

Download Presentation (PDF)

Eight Tips To Ensure Your Organization Keeps Innovating Post-Pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to many technology innovations in health care. The most noticeable transformation is the rise of telehealth with claims skyrocketing from less than 0.01% of total visits to 80% of behavioral health visits during the first quarter of the pandemic (see How’s That Strategic Plan Going?). We predict consumers and payers alike will continue to expect virtual service delivery as part of everyday service long after the pandemic has ended. How can organizations can continue innovating after . . .

This content is restricted to subscribers

Providing Stability & Innovation During Changing Times: Introducing Paul Ricci, CEO of Qualifacts + Credible

As the instability of the evolving health and human service market continues, executive teams across the nation are facing new and unprecedented challenges. The top question on all of our minds? How can we bring stability to our organizations – and ensure sustainability in the months ahead?

Re-thinking longstanding strategies and adopting new, innovative, customer-focused strategies are rarely ‘top of mind’ for executives operating in uncertain times… but while searching for a ‘roadmap’ to stability, successful leaders often find that innovation is the best path to success.

Monica E. Oss, OPEN MINDS’  CEO, and Paul Ricci, CEO of the newly merged Qualifacts + Credible organization, are two industry leaders who’ve embraced innovation to lead their organizations through current and past market disruptions. Join these two leaders for a unique discussion about how innovation, technology adoption, and customer-focused approaches can be the keys you need to unlock stability for your organization in today’s market.

Building The Leadership Team For Tomorrow

This presentation was delivered by OPEN MINDS Senior Associate Paul Duck on February 11, 2021 at The 2021 OPEN MINDS Performance Management Institute. In the presentation, Mr. Duck discussed how to build a leadership team that brokers new ideas and drives change by leveraging organizational culture; create an engaged workforce that fits with your organization’s culture; and best practices for recruiting and retaining top talent.

Download Presentation (PDF)

The 2021 OPEN MINDS Performance Management Executive Survey: Where Are We On The Road To Value

The results are in! Download the 2021 OPEN MINDS Performance Management Executive Survey eBook: Where Are We On The Road To Value.

The survey was presented at The 2021 OPEN MINDS Performance Management Institute by OPEN MINDS Chief Executive Officer, Monica E. Oss.

The survey tracks adoption of value-based reimbursement by specialty provider organizations, including the dominant models and performance measures used. The survey will provide direction on how to make sure your organization keeps pace with the rest of the field.

Download Presentation (PDF)